Wednesday, September 29, 2010

New York education activists mount vigorous response to anti-teacher pro-privatization propaganda film "Waiting for Superman"

A collection of articles and blog posts from the Grassroots Education Movement(New York) on the new documentary "Waiting for Superman". This is a documentary that is being heralded by all the corporate education reformers who have an interest in dismantling public education using charter schools as the leading edge. GEM-NY is a similar group to PEJAM with similar goals. Hats of to GEM-NY for a vigorous response to this piece of corporate propaganda. The movie starts playing in Uptown Theater in Minneapolis this Friday, Oct 1st. We should take a page out of GEM-NY and plan a response soon!

Protesting teachers give 'Waiting for Superman' an 'F'

Last Updated: 4:32 PM, September 25, 2010
Posted: 2:12 AM, September 25, 2010

About 50 public-school teachers and parents of students -- some dressed in Superman costumes -- raged against "Waiting for 'Superman' " before a sold-out screening on the Upper West Side last night.
"This is a corporate movie backed by Bill Gates, and it's just complete nonsense," said Julie Woodward, 63, a public-school teacher for 23 years who is currently teaching health in a Bronx high school.
"There is no teacher voice in the film," she said outside Loews Lincoln Square. "The bottom line is that it's all about class size."

Organized under the Grassroots Education Movement, a group that advocates for student rights, the teachers had "RR," which stood for "Real Reformers," emblazoned on their capes.
They held signs that read, "Stop privatization of public education!" and "Waiting for Superman: Teacher-Bashing, Union-Busting Operation."
"We're dressed as Superman because the work of a public-school teacher in New York is superhuman," said Sam Coleman, 36, who teaches third grade.
The costume show was accompanied by mock lyrics to an Eminem beat: "'Cause we the reformers, yes the real reformers, all you other deformers are just speculating, so won't the real reformers please stand up!"
Aida Diaz, 35, a home-help aide, has a 6-year-old autistic child. She said PS 15 has gone "above and beyond" when helping her son, Daniel Castro.
"They match him with classes that he does well in," she said. "And the results are tangible. He would never be given a chance in charter schools because of his condition."
Organizers insisted that the United Federation of Teachers was not behind the rally.
"We have not asked them to be involved," said Norm Scott, a former union member and organizer of GEM.
"This is just a misleading movie. In the movie, they admit a small percentage of charters are doing well, and I can show you that the same or a higher percentage of public schools are doing well with no hedge-fund money and no private support."

Teachers Protest 'Waiting for Superman'

Updated: Friday, 24 Sep 2010, 10:17 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 24 Sep 2010, 10:17 PM EDT

MYFOXNY.COM - Along with the films being shown inside a movie theatre in Manhattan, another show unfolded outside: Public school teachers, parents of students, and others protested the film "Waiting for Superman."

The documentary has stirred up debate. The director follows five children -- four of whom attend unsuccessful public schools. They're hoping to get into a charter school, including ones in Harlem.
Geoffrey Canada, who runs Harlem Children's Zone, is featured in the documentary.
At the protest, critics of the film squared off with charter school supporters. More than 100 public school supporters gathered outside this theater on the Upper West Side.
In Harlem, Eva Moskowitz, CEO of Success Charter Network, was at the office, working on creating more charter schools.
If you go to see the film "Waiting for Superman," don't be surprised if you see a person or two or more outside handing out pamphlets and protesting the movie.

Still Waiting

by RR (Real Reformer)
Sept. 22, 2010
I had the opportunity to attend an advanced screening of “Waiting for Superman” tonight. I fully expected to be nauseated by what I perceived to be corporate-backed propaganda, with the predictable message of teacher unions as the villain and so-called reformers as heroes. The film’s premise and claims are uninformed and drastically miss the boat in terms of creating a narrative regarding the real issues our public school system faces. Further, the film completely neglects to engage in any meaningful discussion of the real reforms needed to improve educational opportunity for our children.
Some highlights (or lowlights if you will)…
Claims vs. Truth
Claim: “We know that it is possible to give every child a great education,” (based on the success of charter schools).
Truth: Charters in general, and in particular the ones featured in this film, sort and select students, serve far less ELL students, students receiving special education services, and students who qualify for reduced and free lunch compared with their neighboring public schools. The truth is, charters do not outperform public schools, even with every advantage, including smaller student to teacher ratios, the ability to discharge students at will, and increased autonomy.
Claim: “There is usually only one mainstream school in every school district in America that is above average.”
Truth: I do not presume to know the stats on this, but the claim is completely unsupported in the film and would venture to say untrue. As a perfect example, District 15 in Brooklyn has many schools that are above average.
Claim: “If you don’t go to college, you are screwed in America.”
Truth: One of the purveyors of this claim in the film is Bill Gates who says we cannot have American innovation without our kids going to college. This from one of the most significant innovators of our time, who, that’s right, didn’t get a college degree.
Claim: “KIPP schools are better schools because they won’t let kids fail.” “You can’t argue with KIPP’s data.”
Truth: KIPP students and parents sign a “Contract for Excellence” and if the contract is not followed, they can be dismissed from the school.
Claim: “Even progressive educators believed that the achievement gaps in our education system could not be closed.”
Truth: As a progressive educator, I am horrified by this claim made as a general and factual statement, and can personally attest that it is untrue.
Claim: “Kids that go to charter schools (featured in this film I believe is the context) do not just do better than poor kids, they do better than everyone.”
Truth: Some charter schools do better than public schools, some do worse, the majority, do the same.
Claim: “If we replace bad teachers with average teachers we can catch up to Finland in just a few years.” “Unions are a menace and an impediment to reform.” “Teacher union contracts say you can’t fire them.” “Good teachers teach 150% of curriculum in a year, bad teachers only teach 50% of curriculum in a year.” “Teachers get tenure if they just breathe.” “It should be simple, put teachers in a school house where they fill children’s heads with knowledge, but we have made it more complicated.”
Truth: The simple blame game, painting teachers and teacher unions as villains is a completely unsupported claim. Virginia, a right to work state, has some of the worst educational outcomes in the country. Finland, touted with some of the best educational outcomes in the film, is a pro-union system. Teachers do matter, but their tenure is not decided by them, it is decided by principals. Teachers do matter, but we do not write the standards, curriculum, and tests. Teachers do matter, but we live in a climate of extreme external pressure that prevents us from actually teaching.
Teachers do matter, but so do parents, principals, education officials, economic opportunity, school and community programs. The list goes on and on. The fact is, the vast majority of teachers are good teachers, who work hard, and whose ability to speak out with parents and advocate for children is protected only by their tenure. Imagine a system where teachers could not advocate with parents for children!
There are many more claims I could refute in the film, but this has already served as a spoiler for anyone who actually wants to see the film, and frankly, I’m tired.
I taught all day, met after school with parents and educators working on an initiative for our school, and then went and saw a film that basically said: ‘Teachers and their unions bad. Charters good.’ I’ve had enough for one day!
I will end this with one final note…
One of the children in the movie, the story I found to be most touching and compelling, lived with his grandparents, never really knew his mother, and his father died at a young age because of drugs. The tenderness of this child, the wisdom he shared well beyond his years, and the hopes he has for his time at SEED ( he dramatically finds out he has been accepted at the very end of the film after being on a waiting list), quite literally moved me to tears. One of the last scenes in the film is him on his bunk bed at SEED; he leans over, and tacks up a picture of him with his father from years ago.
I have known countless children who share his story, I have had the privilege to teach many, to love them all, and one of them, who I’ll call Junior (who is now nineteen), came to visit me last week. At first he talked about how he was looking for a college to go to. He clearly wanted me to be proud of him. But then put his head in his hands and said, “I can’t lie to you, you was my best teacher, I dropped out of school before I finished.”
My heart sank. All of the deformer attacks on teachers rushed through my mind. Does this make me a bad teacher? Through my tear filled eyes, I asked him why. He told me that his parents had been in and out of jail, on and off drugs, and in and out of shelters from the time he left me in fifth grade. He explained that it became too difficult to keep up. He said he had been waiting for a transfer from a high school in the Bronx. He waited for the DOE to take care of his paperwork for two months, and eventually he gave up. I checked with a few contacts, found him a program that will support him with getting his GED and job training, and reminded him, as I do with all of my students, that I am always here, whenever and if ever you need me.
I have worked in one of the neediest communities in Brooklyn for over ten years as a teacher of children with learning differences. I have students in jail. Students I have never heard from again. Students who come to see me regularly. Students who got scholarships to private schools. Students who scored high on tests. Students who scored low. Students who are tickled with their job pushing shopping carts at a local store. Students who shed their special education label and navigate or navigated their way through general education programs.
What is the measure of my success as an educator? Is my worth narrowly tied to student outcomes like test scores and graduation rates? Is an educator only successful, if his/her students are successful? What is the definition of successful? Junior may not be a success in the so-called reformers eyes, but given the insurmountable odds he has faced and the countless adults who have disappointed him in his life, the fact that he found me again after all of this years and felt safe enough to tell me the truth, to make himself vulnerable, and to ask for help to improve his life highlights the narrow lens with which this film, and we as a people, view education in our society.
It’s complicated. There are no easy answers. Charters are not a panacea. Teachers and their unions are not villains, nor are we superheroes. It is true Junior is a “drop-out”, but I do not consider him to be a failure, nor do I consider myself to be a failure. As a teacher, there are many factors I cannot control. While I cannot be superman, my students have shown me year after year that to the vast majority of them I am their hero, and they are mine. That is all the ‘data’ I need.
If we want to begin to have a real dialogue about real reform, we must address the economic benefits for some that come by excluding large portions of our population from economic access via equitable educational opportunities. If I believed for one second that the current reform agenda held the promise of equalizing educational opportunities for all, I would embrace it, and would be the first standing on the front lines fighting for it. Instead I find myself firmly planted on the other side; the side of real reform with the belief that we can have great community public schools for ALL children if only we stopped waiting and started taking authentic action. We allocate on average $33,000 a year per prison inmate while we allocate an average of $9,000 a year per pupil in our public schools. Something is gravely wrong with these numbers. If we can hold teachers accountable to data, shouldn’t we hold our policy makers to the same standard? It is time to take the long view. Will the Real Reformers please stand up?

No comments:

Post a Comment